blog

TL;DR

Modernism declared that art could be about ideas and feelings, not just things. It was a search for truth and meaning in a chaotic world. It held that art, through innovation, could find this truth. On the downside that search could also lead to arrogance and elitism.

The Bad

• Lack of representation and narrative: Modernist art often abandoned traditional representation of the world, leaving it to the viewer's imagination. This can be seen as a departure from the storytelling tradition of art, which was a key aspect of earlier art forms.
• Abstraction and obscurity: The emphasis on abstract forms and non-representational art can make it difficult for viewers to understand the artist's intentions or the art's meaning. This abstractness can be self-indulgent and detached from the viewer's everyday experience.
• Emphasis on form over content: Modernist art often prioritized the formal aspects of art (color, shape, texture) over the content (subject matter, message, narrative). This led to a focus on the artist's technical skill and expression, potentially at the expense of the artwork's meaning or emotional resonance.
• Arrogance and elitism: Some modernist artists and critics were seen as dismissive of traditional art forms and the general public's taste. There was a focus on intellectual and artistic invention that may be difficult for non-experts to understand or appreciate. This elitism can be perceived as a form of artistic snobbery, where the artist's innovative and experimental approach is prioritized over the viewer's experience.
• Lack of emotional connection: Modernist art can be seen as overly intellectual and cerebral, lacking the emotional resonance and human connection that more traditional art forms often provide.
• Over-reliance on theoretical frameworks: Modernist art was often informed by complex theoretical frameworks, which can be daunting for viewers who are not familiar with these ideas. This creates a disconnection between the artwork and the viewer.
• Tendency to prioritize the avant-garde: Modernist art often celebrates innovation and experimentation, which can lead to a focus on the avant-garde, rather than the traditional.

The Good

• Novel Techniques and Mediums: Modernist artists experimented with new styles, materials, techniques and mediums. This led to the development of new movements like abstract expressionism, cubism and futurism, which increased the possibilities of art.
• Emphasis on the Process: Modernist artists often prioritized the creative process over the final product. This led to a focus on the artist's inner experiences, emotions and thoughts, making their work more personal and introspective.
• Breaking with Tradition: Modernist artists challenged traditional depiction of reality, introducing new perspectives on the world. They rejected the authority of traditional art forms, like portraiture and landscape painting and created new ways of depicting reality. With the invention of photography, the task of faithful reproduction could be handed off to a machine, freeing the artist to work in more subjective, emotional and conceptual territories.
• Expressing the Human Experience: Modernist art often conveyed the complexities and anxieties of modern life. Artists explored themes like alienation, anxiety and the search for meaning in a rapidly changing world — industrialization, urbanization, new theories in psychology (Freud) and physics (Einstein). Modernist art established a new visual language to express the new reality.
  • Cubism shattered single-point perspective to show multiple viewpoints at once, mirroring a more complex, relativistic understanding of space and time.
  • Futurism captured the dynamism, speed and energy of the machine age.
  • Abstract Expressionism Modernist artists like Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko and Willem de Kooning developed this style, which emphasized the process of creating art over the final product. They used color, form and gesture to convey raw emotion and the subconscious, reflecting the focus on inner worlds.
  • Dadaism and Anti-Art: The Dada movement, which emerged during World War I, challenged traditional notions of art and beauty. Dada artists often created anti-art, which questioned the very notion of art itself. Duchamp's "Fountain" forced a pivotal philosophical debate. By presenting a manufactured urinal as art, they argued that the artist's intention and context are as important as the object itself. This opened the door for conceptual art, performance art and installation art, vastly expanding the creative playground.
• The Artist as Genius: Modernism championed the unique, subjective vision of the individual artist. This was a shift from art being a skilled craft in service of a church or patron to being a vehicle for personal expression.
• Activating the Viewer: Instead of providing passive, easy beauty, Modernist art often demands that the viewer participate in creating its meaning. It asks you to question, to feel, to interpret and to connect the dots. This makes the experience of art more active, personal and intellectually stimulating.

TL;DR

Postmodernism is about the *skepticism that any single truth or meaning exists. It argues that all truth is contingent, constructed and relative. On the down side, this has lead to a lack of clarity and inconsistency amongst artists.

Several of my paintings are based on the postmodernist view that art has not really progressed through time to the modern era — art from all periods has value. For example: has elements "appropriated" from: Turner - background, Rousseau - lion, Giorgione - face, Kende - nude, Emanuel - nude, Greek (archaic) - urn, cave painting - Przewalski's horse.

The Bad

• Lack of Clarity: Postmodern art often emphasizes chaos and multiple interpretations, which can make it confusing or difficult to appreciate for viewers accustomed to clear, straightforward works.
• Chaos Over Structure: The emphasis on rejecting Modernism's rigidity can lead to chaotic works that lack focus or coherence, making them confusing, overwhelming and less engaging.
• Abstraction & Distance from Realism: By focusing on fluid forms and abstract concepts like politics or emotions rather than representational imagery, Postmodern art becomes distant from the themes explored in more traditional art.
• Inconsistency Among Artists: Without clear guidelines, Postmodern artists may produce varied and inconsistent works, leading to confusion about its core principles and objectives.
• Lack of coherence and unity: Postmodernist art often rejects traditional notions of art, such as the pursuit of beauty, unity and coherence. This can lead to a sense of disjointedness and fragmentation in the viewer's experience.
• Playfulness and irrelevance: Postmodernist art often prioritizes playfulness, irony and humor over traditional notions of art as a serious and meaningful expression of the human experience. Some critics argue that this can make the art seem trivial or inconsequential.
• Challenging the notion of artistic skill: Postmodernist art often rejects the idea that artistic skill and technical proficiency are essential components of art. This can be seen as a rejection of the value of hard work and dedication that is typically associated with artistic creation.
• Questioning the value of art itself: Postmodernist art often challenges the very notion of what constitutes art and the value that we place on it. This can be seen as abandonment of the traditional role of art as a source of aesthetic pleasure and cultural enrichment.

The Good

• Challenging traditional notions of Art and Identity: Postmodernism questioned the very notion of what constitutes art, challenging traditional notions of beauty, truth and identity. This led to a more inclusive and diverse art world, where artists from different backgrounds and with different experiences could contribute to the conversation.
• Rejection of Traditional Aesthetic Norms: Postmodern art often rejects established rules of Modernism, such as representational imagery, perspective and rationality. This allows artists to work with unconventional forms and themes, expanding the options for artistic expression. By rejecting representational imagery and focusing on abstract forms, postmodern art challenges perceptions of what constitutes "art" and invites a more introspective engagement with art itself.
• Experimental Techniques: Postmodernists frequently use innovative materials, techniques and styles that challenge traditional painting methods, such as collage work, mixed media and fluid, gestural brushstrokes. These techniques create unique textures and compositions that are visually striking.
• Exploration of Abstract Concepts: Unlike Impressionism, which focused on capturing reality through color and light, Postmodern art often deals with abstract ideas like identity, politics, religion and the human condition. This allows artists to critique societal norms and delve into complex emotional or philosophical themes.
• Critique of Modernism: Postmodern art often critiques the rationality and sterility of Modernist ideals. By dismissing logic and simplicity in favor of complexity and ambiguity, it invites viewers to reflect on their own societal assumptions.
• Challenging the notion of a universal truth: Postmodernist artists opposed the idea that there is a single, objective truth. They argued that all truth is contingent, constructed and ultimately relative. By embracing complexity, ambiguity and uncertainty, they opened up new avenues for artistic expression and encouraged viewers to think critically about the world.
• Inclusivity and Accessibility: Postmodern works can be interpreted in multiple ways, making them accessible to a wide range of audiences who may not share the same cultural or intellectual background as traditional art viewers. This inclusivity often broadens the audience for art.
• Cultural and Political commentary: Many postmodern works address social, political or cultural issues of their time through bold statements or themes, making them meaningful beyond the purely aesthetic experience.
• Influence on Other Movements: Postmodernism has influenced a wide range of art movements, including minimalist art, suprematism and even digital art. Its emphasis on experimentation and innovation continues to inspire artists today.
• Stimulating for Audiences: The unconventional nature of postmodern art often stimulates curiosity and dialogue among viewers, encouraging them to think deeply about the meaning and purpose of art.
• Diversifying art forms: Postmodernism led to a proliferation of new art forms, such as performance art, video art and installation art. This diversification expanded the options for artistic expression and allowed artists to go beyond the limits of traditional mediums.
• Embracing playfulness and irreverence: Postmodernist art often featured playful, tongue-in-cheek and irreverent approaches to art-making, which helped to subvert the seriousness and solemnity that had characterized traditional art forms. This playfulness allowed artists to engage with the art world in a more lighthearted and humorous way.
• Influencing popular culture: Postmodernism has had a lasting impact on popular culture, influencing the work of fashion and interior designers, writers, musicians and filmmakers. Its irreverent, playful spirit and use of bright colors, asymmetrical compositions and dynamic forms has created a rich vocabulary for contemporary culture.

TL;DR

• Its Strength was its rigor and its commitment to preserving high technical and intellectual standards.*
• Its Weakness was that this rigor calcified into dogma and conformity, resisting innovation and personal expression.*

The Bad

Conformity

The academic system was built on a specific set of rules for creating "good" art. This included:

• Idealization over Realism: Figures should be perfect and idealized, not as they appear in real life (with flaws, blemishes or ordinary bodies). This was based on classical Greek and Roman art.
• Formal Composition: Scenes had to be carefully constructed, often in a triangular or pyramidal arrangement, to create a sense of balance and order.
• Conservative Color and Finish: Colors were often muted and subordinate to the drawing. The finish was expected to be smooth and polished, with no visible brushstrokes, creating an almost porcelain-like surface. This stifled creativity and personal expression. An artist's individual style or a new way of seeing was considered a fault, not a virtue.

Rigid Hierarchy of Subjects (The Genre Hierarchy)

The Académie established a strict ranking for subject matter, which dictated an artist's prestige and success.

1. History Painting At the top. Included religious, mythological, historical and allegorical scenes. These were considered the most intellectual, requiring knowledge of literature, history and the Bible.
2. Portraiture
3. Genre Painting Scenes of everyday life.
4. Landscape
5. Still Life At the very bottom. Considered mere copying without intellectual depth. This devalued artistic subjects that people could connect with in their daily lives (like landscapes or still lifes) and forced artists to work on "important" but often remote and idealized themes.

Lack of Innovation and Originality

Academicism was associated with a strict adherence to traditional techniques and styles, which limited the possibilities for innovation and originality. The Académie believed that the artistic ideals of the Renaissance and Classical antiquity had reached a peak that should be emulated, not surpassed. This created a culture of:

• Elitism: Art was made for and judged by, a small, wealthy and educated elite who understood the complex references and approved of the conservative values.
• Exclusivity: The institutions of art and education were often exclusive and elitist, which limited access to artists from lower social classes and backgrounds.
• Rejection of the Contemporary: It ignored the social, industrial and scientific revolutions of the 19th century. While the world was changing rapidly, the Académie was still promoting paintings of Roman gods and Greek heroes. This made art irrelevant to the modern experience and the growing middle class. It was seen as backward-looking and out of touch.

The Salon and Gatekeeping

The annual Salon de Paris was the only significant venue for artists to exhibit and build a reputation. A jury of Academicians decided what was shown.

• Arbitrary Rejection: The jury was notoriously conservative, routinely rejecting works that deviated from their standards in style, subject or technique.
• The Salon des Refusés: The situation became so dire that in 1863, Emperor Napoleon III had to authorize a separate exhibition for the thousands of artists rejected from the official Salon — the famous "Salon of the Rejected." This was where Manet's Déjeuner sur l'herbe was first shown, causing a scandal. This prevented new ideas from reaching the public and crushed the careers of non-conformist artists.

The "Factory" Model of Art Production

To succeed, artists often had to:

• Produce repetitive, crowd-pleasing works.
• Rely on wealthy patrons who demanded specific, conservative subjects.
• Work with a team of assistants (especially for large history paintings). This reduced art to a commodity and undermined the Romantic ideal of the artist as a solitary, inspired genius.

Lack of relevance

Academicism was often seen as being out of touch with the changing needs and values of society and was criticized for being irrelevant and outdated.

The Good

Technical Mastery

Academic artists were known for their exceptional technical skill, which they developed through rigorous training and practice. Their work was characterized by precise draftsmanship, detailed rendering and a mastery of various mediums, such as oil painting, sculpture and printmaking.

• Drawing (*Disegno): The foundation of all academic training was life drawing. Students spent countless hours drawing from plaster casts of classical sculptures and live models. This resulted in an ability to render the human form accurately and expressively.
• Complex Composition: Academic artists were masters of arranging multiple figures in a large, coherent scene. They knew how to guide the viewer's eye, create drama and build a narrative through posture, gesture and placement.
• Mastery of Media: Techniques like glazing in oil painting to achieve rich, deep colors and subtle transitions were passed down and perfected within this system.

Intellectual and Narrative Depth

By placing History Painting at the top of its hierarchy, Academicism insisted that art be more than just a pretty picture; it should be a vehicle for ideas.

• Elevated Subject Matter: Artists engaged with the great stories of the Bible, mythology and history. To be a successful academic painter, you had to be well-read and able to translate complex narratives and allegories into visual form.
• Moral and Civic Lessons: These paintings were often intended to inspire virtue, patriotism and reflection. They were seen as a way to educate the public and elevate public taste by connecting them to a shared cultural heritage.

Preservation of Cultural Heritage

• Connection to the Past: By venerating the classics and the Renaissance, they maintained a continuous link to the artistic achievements of the past. Artists like Raphael, Poussin and the sculptors of antiquity were constant reference points.
• A Standard of Quality: While this standard became restrictive, it provided a clear, shared framework for what constituted "good" art. This created a common language that patrons, critics and the public could understand.

Realism and representation

Academic artists were known for their commitment to realism and representation. They believed in depicting the world as it was, without distortion or exaggeration. This emphasis on realism was seen as a way to create a sense of truth and authenticity in their work.

Social and cultural significance

Academicism was seen as a way to promote social and cultural values. Artists were expected to create work that was considered respectable, tasteful and suitable for public viewing. This emphasis on social and cultural significance was seen as a way to create a sense of civic duty and responsibility among artists.

Institutional support and patronage

The academic system provided a clear career path for Artists

• Structured Training: The progression from drawing casts, to life drawing, to full paintings was a logical and thorough way to learn.
• System of Patronage and Recognition: Winning prizes like the prestigious Prix de Rome provided funding, prestige and state commissions. The annual Salon was the primary platform for an artist to achieve fame and secure patrons. Academicism was closely tied to the institutions of art and education, such as the Académie des Beaux-Arts in Paris. The Académie and other institutions provided artists with a sense of stability, support and patronage, which allowed them to focus on their craft and to produce high-quality work.

Production of Great Art

Many works created within the Academic system are masterpieces by any measure.